City Attacks Catholic Farmer for Belief in God’s Marriage

City Attacks Catholic Farmer for Belief in God’s Marriage

City Attacks Catholic Farmer for Belief in God’s Marriage

Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys challenge city policy that ousted farmer from market for his belief in God’s marriage as the union between one man and one woman.

LANSING, Mich. – Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys representing an organic farmer in Michigan filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday against the city of East Lansing after officials ousted his family business from the local farmer’s market, where he has done business since 2010, because city officials learned he believes marriage is the union of one man and one woman. The farmer wants to be able to sell food to all people, but the city is preventing him from doing so at the farmer’s market.

At issue is an unconstitutional, unlawful, and complex “sexual orientation” policy that city officials adopted specifically to shut out Steve Tennes and Country Mill Farms—his family’s fruit orchard—purely because he posted on Facebook his belief in biblical marriage. The city did this even though Tennes, his family, and the orchard are in Charlotte, 22 miles from East Lansing, well outside the city’s boundaries and beyond its jurisdiction.

Prophecies of Our Lady of Good Success About Our TimesLearn All About the Prophecies of Our Lady of Good Success About Our Times

“All Steve wants to do is sell his food to anyone who wants to buy it, but the city isn’t letting him,” said ADF Legal Counsel Kate Anderson. “People of faith, like the Tennes family, should be free to live and work according to their deeply held beliefs without fear of losing their livelihood. If the government can shut down a family farmer just because of the religious views he expresses on Facebook—by denying him a license to do business and serve fresh produce to all people—then no American is free.”

“Americans have always had the cherished freedom to believe and to express those beliefs. This lawsuit simply asks the court to uphold that freedom for a Catholic farmer, who should be free to sell his produce without coercion, discrimination, or intimidation by the government because of his beliefs about marriage,” added ADF Senior Counsel Jeremy Tedesco. “The city must respect Steve’s constitutionally protected freedom to express his religious beliefs on social media sites without being forced to surrender his right to participate in the marketplace.”

After seeing Tennes’ Facebook post from Aug. 24, 2016, city officials went to great lengths to force him out of the farmer’s market. First, they tried to pressure him, telling Country Mill Farms that they did not want the farm at the next scheduled market the following Sunday, that they had received complaints about Tennes’ post, and that protests would occur if Country Mill Farms continued to participate in the market. They urged Country Mill Farms to withdraw immediately, but Tennes persevered and continued to serve the market’s customers. No protests ever took place.

When Tennes posted something online about his belief in natural marriage again in December 2016, after the close of the market season, the officials decided that his expression conflicted with East Lansing’s policy regarding sexual orientation. But because that policy is codified in the city’s Human Relations Ordinance, which cannot be enforced against Country Mill Farms, the officials crafted a new policy, bypassing its jurisdictional limits under Michigan law, to expel Tennes and his farm from the farmer’s market as punishment for his views.

The policy requires vendors to agree to and comply with the city’s “Human Relations Ordinance and its public policy against discrimination…while at the market and as a general business practice.” The ordinance makes it illegal for anyone to “make a statement which indicates that an individual’s patronage or presence at a place of public accommodation… is…unwelcome or unacceptable because of…sexual orientation, gender identity, or expression…,” among other designated classes. Yet it does not define “discriminate” or any of the key terms that would govern enforcement.

Based on the new policy, and in response to Country Mill Farms application for the 2017 farmer’s market, an official informed Steve Tennes by letter that he was not in compliance and that, therefore, the city was prohibiting him from participating. The notice included an attachment of Steve’s December Facebook post as evidence, despite the fact that the post is constitutionally protected free speech.

10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” is Harmful and Must be Opposed

The complaint in Country Mill Farms v. City of East Lansing, which ADF attorneys filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, explains how the city policy violated the Constitution’s guarantees of free speech, freedom of religion, and equal protection—in addition to other protections. It requests that the court restore Country Mill Farms’ constitutionally protected freedoms and prevent a violation of Michigan’s law governing cities.

The suit also asks the court to halt the discriminatory policy, declare it unlawful and unconstitutional, and award nominal and compensatory damages, so that Tennes and Country Mill Farms can once again serve all customers at the farmer’s market.

Related Articles

Comments Policy: TFP.org reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of TFP.org. TFP.org will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.

  • glenbo

    One cannot “attack” a belief.
    Beliefs cannot be altered unless the believer changes his/her mind.
    The solution to adhering to one’s beliefs is to discontinue to offer services to those you have been taught to reject.

  • Anna Cospelich

    OK What about the discrimination against Christians, Catholics in particular? What about our rights of freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of expression of our religion? Huh?

  • Janice Marler

    There is a petition to sign about this matter from TFP- which I didn’t sign. I won’t because the homosexual agenda isn’t responsible for the man’s problem. I do believe that Tennes should be able to be part of the Farmer’s Market and that his stance against against homosexual marriage has nothing to do with the Farmer’s Market but this situation is much larger than the homosexual agenda. It is the taking away or our rights. It is government pushing whatever they want to be against the individual. And, of course, it is against our religious freedom. The petition seems to blame homosexuals for Tennes situation. Anyway, I can’t sign the petition as it is now worded.

    • glenbo

      >>”this situation is much larger than the homosexual agenda. It is the taking away or our rights.”<<

      What rights are being taken away?

      • Mark Bradshaw

        Freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of religion. These rights are being severely infringed upon through the creation of laws that compel speech (or limit what speech can be used), limits one’s ability to form consensual associations in business, and limit how one is able to adhere to the tenants of their faith (while not actually hurting anyone else).

        The “homosexual agenda” seeks legal recognition for unions. This “agenda” results in the loss of rights for some (business owners, individuals), while creating special rights for others (homosexuals).

        • glenbo

          >>” This “agenda” results in the loss of rights for some “<<
          What rights have been lost?
          Evidence, please.