Why Ladies and Gentlemen Are Forbidden on New York Trains

Why Ladies and Gentlemen Are Forbidden on New York TrainsPassengers, customers or whatever you want to call them are welcome to ride in the New York City transport system. Just don’t call them ladies or gentlemen. The city’s Metropolitan Transit Authority has outlawed the expression in yet another bizarre episode of the politically correct Culture War.

“Ladies and gentlemen” is not inclusive enough for the thought police patrolling the lines. Never mind that conductors have been doing this for a century. Never mind that the automatic announcement systems are programmed with the old courtesy formulas. Never mind that passengers might even like to be addressed in this manner.

Learn All About the Prophecies of Our Lady of Good Success About Our TimesProphecies of Our Lady of Good Success About Our Times

All this must be changed immediately on buses, trains and stations. The MTA has ruled that conductors must now use new formulas that scrap the traditional “Ladies and gentlemen” suggesting “passengers” or “riders” as replacements. Conductors will be monitored by management for compliance. They must even manually override the automatic systems until new recordings can be made. Thus has it been decreed, and let no one dare do the contrary.

The Little Things are the Culture

Some people might think these small changes are insignificant. Such things make no difference in our daily lives. However, things like this are indicative of what is wrong with America today. They change the culture because little things are the culture.

Whenever a revolution breaks out, there is always an attempt to change the little things. Curiously, revolutionaries always change the manner of addressing people. The French Revolution of 1789 quickly stripped people of their titles, however humble, and insisted that everyone be called “citizen.” The Russian Revolution in 1917 likewise made people equal by calling them “comrades.”

10 Razones Por las Cuales el “Matrimonio” Homosexual es Dañino y tiene que Ser Desaprobado

These were changes in the culture that indicated a shift in society’s way of understanding people. They were tiny alterations forced upon the people, and that promoted an ideological agenda. During these revolutions, the neutered terms of address signaled that everyone was completely equal in everything, including intelligence, ability and talents. Using “comrade” signaled to all that the person was part of the communist tyranny that leveled society and controlled all aspects of life.

A Postmodern Diktat

Suppressing ladies and gentlemen has a particular postmodern overtone. “Citizen “and “comrade” at least identified people as something permanent. The new designation of “passenger” or “rider” resists a permanent condition and merely describes someone’s temporary state.

It fits well with the postmodern ambiguity that blurs all distinctions and hates all definitions. People are what they decide to be at the moment. People are encouraged to self-identify as what they perceive themselves to be. It is not a coincidence that the suppressed terms were changed because they were not inclusive of “transgendered” passengers who did not feel comfortable being defined by our God-given male-female binary categories.

The train authority diktat is postmodernity at its worst. It reduces people to mere simulacra (to use their term) in which everything becomes insubstantial forms or semblances of something.

The Meaning of Ladies and Gentlemen

That is what is wrong with suppressing ladies and gentlemen. It strips people of their dignity. It takes away from both women and men all that is distinguished, honored, or worthy of respect.

When a woman was called a lady, it used to be a compliment. In accepting this title, the woman is held to the high standard of behaving like a lady that appreciates grace, modesty and beauty. It assumed a desire to be feminine and glory in those qualities that today are so neglected.

When a man was called a gentleman, it was also a compliment. It assumed a willingness to be held to high standards. Men were asked to overcome the more brutal part of their nature and display masculine gentleness that spoke of courtesy, consideration and protection—virtues that are now neglected.

10 Razones Por las Cuales el “Matrimonio” Homosexual es Dañino y tiene que Ser Desaprobado

When a group was addressed as ladies and gentlemen, it expressed a complementary and mutual respect between the two sexes. It had none of the class struggle overtones of feminist propaganda. Instead, it celebrated the differences between the two with ceremony and distinction.

FREE e-Book, A Spanish Mystic in Quito: Sor Mariana de Jesus Torres

FREE e-Book: A Spanish Mystic in Quito

This treatment is the fruit of Christian civilization. It was the Church that first recognized and elevated the dignity of men, but especially women who were so degraded in pagan lands and times. Christian morality created an atmosphere of charity, trust and respect that both harmonized and protected the sexes.

Return to Barbaric Ways

Thus, the seemingly-insignificant suppression of ladies and gentlemen on New York’s trains represents a giant step backward. It affirms that we need no longer behave like ladies and gentlemen but rather like whatever we want to be or happen to be at the moment.

We are free to revert to the barbaric ways of old. People are free to disrespect, harass and offend everyone equally bad. Other people become merely the instruments of our gratification.

The recent sexual harassment scandals should come as no surprise. They are the product of a rotten culture where people no longer treat those around them as ladies and gentlemen.

Related Articles

Comments Policy: TFP.org reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of TFP.org. TFP.org will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.

  • Theycallmechuck

    Good article. Well said.

  • ALLAN

    TOO MANY PEOPLE HAVE A RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR CHURCH AND NOT WITH THE GOD OF THE BIBLE. I SPENT 22 YEARS IN THE BIGGEST CATHOLIC PARISH IN CHICAGO, THE PRIESTS ALWAYS PREACHED A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHURCH, NOT ONCE WITH JESUS ! READ; MATTHEW 10;34 ALSO, THE COMMUNIST PLAN FOR TAKEOVER.

    • PhilOFS

      The Church is the Mystical Body of Christ (Pope Pius XII.) What hasn’t happen post Vatican II is the reading and in depth study of The Bible, sacramental theology, and ecclesiology by Catholics. Poll after poll shows that Catholics know the least about their faith than any other Christians. Failure on part of priests to preach the faith.

  • Some of what you say here sounds pessimistic and exaggerated. It may be more a matter of people focusing less on gender and more on just being human, which is OK. Gender roles aren’t as permanent as spiritual identity. Perhaps the break down of sexual identity is a natural part of human evolution…part of the divine plan. More about evolution than evilution. Christ has won the victory over sin. Let’s remember and celebrate that.

    • Gwaredd Thomas

      You must have meant human devolution. And, the term ‘gender’ was never used prior to the so-called feminist movement. On applications the designation was alway “sex”; I’m old enough to remember. It looks like your one of those millenials–throughly brain-washed.

      • No, not brainwashed by the left or liberal females. I’m a conservative Catholic, Eucharistic Minister. I believe the issue of determining one’s “true gender” is more a process of enlightenment rather than an act of the Devil. People may need to pass through the dark night of the soul in order to realise that their true identity has nothing to do with their sex or “gender”. I’m certain Pope F would agree.

        • Gwaredd Thomas

          “Pope Francis?” Are you serious? Well, I guess for someone who is a “Eucharistic Minister” who handles the Body of Christ with unconsecrated hands that makes sense. Another brain-dead Novus Ordo nutter who’s swallowed the whole Vatican II shtick hook, line and sinker. The Vatican II “Church” fits into the Church of the ages as does a fish in a birds nest.

          • Your site suggested that you were a traditional Catholic so I followed. I can see now that you aren’t. This conversation would have been different if you were. I won’t follow any longer. Try some kindness. It might help.

          • Gwaredd Thomas

            As a matter of fact I am a Traditional Catholic for 22 years. You, however are not. I told you the truth, if you can’t handle it that’s not my problem. That’s the main problem with the Vatican II “church” it’s all about luv, kindness, charity, and open-mindedness. Christ wasn’t exactly kind when He called the Jooz hypocrites, white sepulchres, and children of the devil. You “won’t follow any longer” because you can’t stand have people calling you out. Anyone who can convice themselves that holding the Body of Christ with their unconsecrated hands just because “Fr” Bob says so, has run off the rails.

            Vatican II, sending souls to hell since 1962.

    • PhilOFS

      Christ resurrected did not cast off his manhood. In the resurrection neither will we. There will be male and female because that is the way GOD, blessed is HE, created us!