| A Time for Action: The Da Vinci Code Rejected |
|
|
|
| Written by John Horvat II | |||
| Wednesday, 24 May 2006 15:00 | |||
|
On May 19, 2006, The Da Vinci Code was released nationwide, and a polarized America was stirred up all the more with this latest example of blasphemy against the Faith.
For months, the media and the film’s promoters have highlighted the various nonfictional issues raised in this “fictional” work. Many Catholics saw the author’s unequivocal affirmations denying the divinity of Christ, the establishment of the Papacy and true origins of the Church as a veiled blasphemous attack.
At first, the Catholic response was a systematic and massive refutation of Dan Brown’s errors. Dozens of books and documentaries “decoded,” “cracked” or “broke” the pseudo-cryptic code that so many, including the author, have mistaken for the truth.
Blasphemy has always touched a raw nerve with Americans, and The Da Vinci Code went beyond that. Never before has Church teachings and history been so grossly distorted in a major motion picture. Never before has the Divinity of Jesus Christ been denied so brutally before such a vast audience. Yet the overwhelming media hype surrounding the film made any reaction seem impossible.
However, the idea of protest caught on, and Catholics everywhere were energized. What began as a small effort to find a few local organizers soon exploded into a massive grassroots networks that has led to over 2,000 protests across the nation.
An American Cross Section
Professionals, doctors and lawyers offered to lead protests; musicians and artists put their talents to work; university students took advantage of the summer vacation to put together protests. Church and pro-life youth groups also joined in. Some people located area theaters showing the film and organized the vigils. Others planned meetings and barbecues to discuss strategy, and set up Web sites especially for their protests.
Organizers used innovation and initiative to recruit others. One organizer went door-to-door asking for help. Others took their protests posters to church and restaurants enlisting help wherever they went. Still others posted signs on their lawns or put them visibly in their cars. The TFP web site listing of organizers got protesters together.
Reparation for blasphemy became the cause that united Catholics and overwhelmed the phone banks at TFP’s Rejecting The Da Vinci Code Central near Topeka, Kan. People who never thought about defending publicly Our Lord and the Blessed Mother suddenly were leading the charge and making a stand.
Incredible Obstacles
Peer pressure was another obstacle. Friends and neighbors told protesters not to get involved. Others said that everyone would laugh at them. Fellow Catholics said the best thing was to do nothing! Shamefully, there were parish priests who said they read the book and saw no problem in its blatant disregard for Church teachings.
Despite evidence that negative publicity does hurt companies, many repeated the mantra that protests gives publicity to the film. Many even cited The Passion of the Christ as an example, though there were no massive protests in front of theaters for that blockbuster film.
Others were told to go to another movie—do anything but protest. However, such obstacles only strengthened the organizers’ resolve. Many of them were more determined than ever to go ahead.
Support from Bishops
In a letter to American TFP President Raymond Drake, Archbishop Wilton Gregory of Atlanta wrote, “I send my support and my encouragement to all those who will be praying and protesting during these upcoming days.”
Bishop Robert W. Finn of Kansas City, St. Joseph, wrote, “Thank you for your prayerful and peaceful efforts to give public witness to the truth of Jesus Christ and His Church, and the belief of Christians, even as they are belittled and blasphemed in The Da Vinci Code.”
Breaking the Consensus
However, few were prepared to be so well received and accepted by the public. Across the country, reports indicated that a majority of the passersby supported the protests. Protesters received honks of approval from drivers or a thumbs-up sign. People came up to them and thanked them for being there.
The protests helped to break the consensus that everyone is behind The Da Vinci Code. The protesters were living proof that dissenters were not alone.
From the Frontlines
In Richmond, Va., eighteen protesters found widespread support. In particular, they were impressed by a group of children. As they approached and read the protesters’ signs, one of them said, ”I love Jesus, too!” and they all started singing and supporting the protest.
Another protest organizer reported on a similar enthusiasm from sixth graders who saw their protest and started asking questions. Several young boys became very excited about the idea of protesting and even offered to pray a Rosary of reparation. “It was such a blessing to see these young children get excited about their faith!” said a protest organizer.
An 8-year-old boy at a protest in Hudson, N.Y., approached a reporter and asked him to print his story. The reporter listened intently as the boy stated, “Tell people I hate The Da Vinci Code. Don’t go see it.”
One lady who saw a prayer vigil protest said seeing Catholics witnessing for the faith encouraged her to persevere in the Faith. In tears, she continued, “The Catholic Church is still alive.”
Many organizers reported cooperation from security officers and mall managers who were against the film. At times, protesters were asked to move to other locations, and these new locations provided better visibility for the protests. In fact, there were 22 people protesting on the public sidewalk outside a shopping center when security came and said they had to move. When asked where they might move, the security officer said, “Well, since AMC Theater is showing this, and the other merchants have no part, we are arranging to have you protest in front of the theater!”
There were cases where a brave parish pastor would lead his parish into protests. Such occasions were always successful events and proved to be a source of blessing for the whole parish. One admiring Catholic recounts the story of a parish priest who, with an injured foot and using a cane, walked back and forth during the protest in front of the crowd saying the Rosary, slowly, loudly and clearly. She described the experience as “powerful.”
Of course, the protests were not without opposition. Some protesters found people who would hold up hastily drawn signs, sneering, jeering, and parodying the prayerful stance of the protesters. Others preferred not to face the protesters and would courageously scream “it’s only fiction” or some other slogan as they drove by in their cars. In St. Louis, two individuals came to the theater dressed up as “bishops,” dancing and gesturing before awaiting cameras.
The Honor of Protesting
“Catholics need to do more of this kind of public display rather than sitting inside our Churches while our Creator is vilified,” wrote a woman from New York. “While ‘God the Father’ and ‘His Son’ are driven out of our country—we sit by waiting for someone else ‘to do something.’ Well, our little group did something today in the hot blazing sun. We stood up for Jesus on public domain in a dignified, respectful way, and God-willing we and others will do so again.”
“What a joy to be a real Catholic today!” wrote one lady returning from a protest.
Over 2,000 prayer vigils and protests were held nationwide. The most important accomplishment was that these prayer vigils were acts of reparations in atonement for the blasphemies contained in The Da Vinci Code book and film.
However, an added effect of this effort was that so many overcame the obstacles and answered the call to reject The Da Vinci Code. Catholics felt the joy of being Catholic. Moreover, they felt part of a vast family of souls from all over the country, who radiated like a thousands points of light to stand up for Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Holy Church.
|





