| Barbarians,
Pagans Neo-Barbarians Neo-Pagans
By Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira
Habitually half-naked, and here covered only in a haphazard
way, his whole physique reflects the hard and brutal struggle
with a harsh environment. Physically he is very strong.
On his face he bears the marks of a horrible scarring which
he underwent to to “adorn” himself. Thus, this poor child
of the bush, touched only slightly by contact with civilization,
manifests the natural exuberance of ungoverned human nature.
He is a barbarian, a pagan, whose nature has benefited
neither from the divine action of the Church, nor from the
aesthetic and refining influx of Christian civilization.
In spite of his appearance, which would make children
tremble, he inspires pity. He is more like an exuberant
and uneducated child than a criminal.
Here we see communist youths in a demonstration in Berlin.
Their countenances, impregnated with hate, show the most
sinister aspects of human nature and a most determined rejection
of the tendencies and dispositions that a person acquires
when well-mannered. Here we see hatred, distrust, the absence
of any sentiment that dignifies or softens and the capacity
to destroy and never to construct. What is even more shocking
is an extraordinary lucidity and stability in this pessimistic
state of spirit which is found in the proper soul of communism
and reflected in the faces of these youths, victims of the
infernal propaganda of Moscow.
They are the neo-barbarians in this era of neo-paganism.
They are souls led astray by totally erroneous principles.
Their instincts, unleashed by an amoral ideology, turn guns
forged by civilization against civilization itself.
Theoretically, the question remains: Which of these two
is more terrible? The fruits of apostasy are worse than
those of paganism. One cannot be blamed for being ignorant
of the truth; but there is always blame in repudiating it.
A communist government, when established in Christian nations,
is an apostasy. And, as such, it carries more blame before
God.
Laden with greater blame, with more deadly arms, how can
it not be more terrible?
|